StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Kenneth Millers Ideas - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Kenneth Millers Ideas" states that Kenneth Miller is considered one of the most pragmatic and realistic individuals in terms of principles. His prowess comes from the fact that religiously he is a catholic, and scientifically he is a biologist…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
Kenneth Millers Ideas
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Kenneth Millers Ideas"

Religion and Science Religion and science have widely been applied by believers and intellectuals respectively, to help in the conceptualization of facts and events. An important point to note is that, religion derives the understanding of facts and events from the mere idea of belief and faith. However, science focuses on understanding facts and events by through conducting empirical and pragmatic experiments. There has been a lot of contradiction between religion and science, believers and intellectuals separately claim their own understanding and explanations of events and facts to be true. However, in the midst of all those controversies, there are individuals who try to establish a compromise between religion and science. This paper will include the explanation of two quotes, in light of Kenneth Miller’s ideas and thereafter my critical comments regarding the quotes. 1. “Such so-called creation science, thoroughly analyzed, corrupts both science and religion and it deserves a place in the intellectual wastebasket.” Miller, God the Charlatan. The first quote to be explained will come from the third chapter of Millers’ book Finding Darwinian’s God, known as ‘God the Charlatan’ (Miller 57). Miller, as a Roman Catholic and as a Biologist, tries to bring a compromise between religion and science. In the third chapter, there is a statement “…creation science …corrupts...science and religion…deserves…intellectual wastebasket, (Miller 67). Here, Miller argues against creation science, since it is limited on the idea that the universe in its entirety as a creation of God, cannot borrow other theories that in its explanation, and most importantly the evolution theory. Miller does not choose sides when it comes to understanding the universe in terms of religion and science. In the statement, he proves that it is not pragmatic or realistic to apply creation science as the ultimate explanation of events taking place on earth. Miller purports that, creation scientists, mislead in terms of applying the version of religious creation to help in understanding the universe. From the statement, Miller further points out that creation scientist entangle the chances of understanding the universe through both science and religion. As a pragmatist, who understands and appreciates religion and science, Miller, affirms on the idea of kicking creation science into wastebaskets. Miller is lead to that idea to the fact that creation scientists embrace God only through disowning science (Miller 80). Miller is a pragmatic individual, has embedded in him religion and science. He understands that understanding the universe, cannot be based on only religion as creation scientist try to claim (Miller 60). When factoring in on the question, from a creation scientist’s perspective, it is clear that they are actually missing a point or two on understanding the universe scientifically. Miller is right when he disowns the position of the creation scientists. I accordingly agree with Miller when he asserts that creation scientist misunderstand the connection between human existence, religion and science (Miller 63). In religious books, which are of different kinds of religions, there are explanations for the universe existence’s, which are decisively related to science. Creation scientists, disapprove the idea of accounting the origin of life through naturalistic process, and most importantly through evolutionary theory. Although, we can agree with creation scientist that evolution theory is not the decisive explanation of human existence, we can also disagree with them that religion is not the only explanation of human existence too (Miller 63). 2. “Why did this magician (the god of the intelligent design believers), in order to produced the contemporary world, find it necessary to create and destroy creatures, habitats, and ecosystems millions of time over?” Miller, God the magician. The second quote to be explained from Kenneth Miller’s Book Finding Darwinian God, is from the fourth chapter, headed God the Magician. Miller asks, “…why is this magician…god of intelligent design believers...destroy creatures…habitats…ecosystems” (Miller 92). In the above statement, Miller seeks to put across a question to the advocators of intelligence design, while at the same time disapproving their sentiments. Individuals, who are advocators of intelligence design, purport that God is the supreme designer of all events and circumstances taking place on the universe (Miller 93). From the quote, Miller points the weakness present in intelligence design in terms of understanding the universe. Intelligence design, as Miller explains is a modernized form of creation science, which has the objective of applying twisted religion in the exemplification of human existence. Miller is not frugal when selecting the word to describe the designer referred in intelligence design; he uses the word magician (Miller 99). It is also evident in the statement that Miller disapproves the sentiment of an intelligent designer, who creates things perfectly then afterwards they become old, get destroyed or disintegrate. He has the opinion that an intelligent designer would not sit back and let his creation go to ruin in terms of disintegrating or getting destroyed (Miller 101). The decisive argument put across by Miller is that contrary to an intelligent designer, in science a pragmatist scientist will thrive to develop rational sentiments to help in the exemplification of universal truth (Miller 126). Intelligent designers, in their own fashion, try to disapprove scientific explanation regarding the existence of the universe. I disapprove the idea of intelligent designers, taking scientific understanding, and in the process reformulate it with the objective of entwining it to suit their own explanations (Miller 81). Miller is right when he expresses the opinion that intelligent designers, base their understanding on magic (Miller 99). It is critical to note that intelligent designers also fall short of making their argument correct due to the fact that an intelligent designer, who creates nifty things, will not sit back and see them get ruined (Miller 100). It is in my view, same as Miller’s view that intelligent design is a movement established to frustrate scientific developments developed from the theory of evolution (Miller 82). Intelligence design can be acceptable if they embrace the notion of living things going through various developmental processes that are independent of God’s direct creation (Miller 128). Conclusion Kenneth Miller is considered as one of the most pragmatic and realistic individuals in terms of principles. His prowess comes from the fact that religiously he is a catholic, and scientifically he is a biologist. He has focused on understanding the world in terms of applying religious belief and scientific experiments. He addresses the idea that religion or science alone cannot be used when conceptualizing the existence of the universe. Both religion and science are applicable when trying to understand the existence of the universe. Creation science and intelligent design have been put across to help in understanding the universe in the expense of science. In many occasion, individuals who advocate for creation science and intelligent design try to overwhelm Darwin’s evolution theory. Miller, in his book, categorically reasons out against creation science and intelligence design since they seem to point out the existence of the universe of God’s perspective only. Miller’s argument, against creation science and intelligence design, is as a result of their weakness in misunderstanding God and the universe. In fact, he expresses that creation scientists see God as a charlatan, while individuals who support intelligence design, view God as a magician. \ Works Cited Miller K. Finding Darwin’s God. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1999. Print Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Religion and Science Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1585639-religion-and-science
(Religion and Science Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 1)
https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1585639-religion-and-science.
“Religion and Science Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/religion-and-theology/1585639-religion-and-science.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Kenneth Millers Ideas

Arthur Miller

The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) got interested in the millers works after the release of the Crucible.... During his time in college, his greatest influence was from his professor and lifelong friend Professor kenneth Rowe (Wald, 2007).... RUNNING HEAD: RESEARCH PAPER ON AUTHUR MILLER Research Paper on Authur Miller Name Subject Date Research Paper on Authur Miller Born in Harlem New York, in 1915, Arthur Asher Miller lived his life to the fullest becoming a well renowned playwright and scriptwriter....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Fashioned Gender through Cloth Rite: the New Haute Couture of the Postmodern Society

This essay "Fashioned Gender through Cloth Rite: the New Haute Couture of the Postmodern Society" focuses on fashion and the appearance of the haute couture in a postmodern context and will explore how fashion and appearance help people create their social identities through cloth rite.... ... ... ...
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Chapter 6 and 7 Summary: Finding Darwin's God

kenneth R.... Chapter 6 and 7 Summary: Finding Darwin's God kenneth R.... orks CitedMiller, kenneth R.... Miller illustrates in chapter 6 how religion and science have come to see each other as enemies and the explains the unreasonable motivations of each....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Finding Darwin's God

The author of the assignment "Finding Darwin's God" will begin with the statement that kenneth Miller, without doubt, is trying to successfully present and explain the compatibility that exists between the theory of quantum physics and Darwin's God.... ... ... ... Right from the beginning, Miller preserves his belief that God's creation is present in Universe at the same time the logical perception of scientists in terms of biological evolution to has its hold....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Canterbury Tales by Chaucer

This book review "Canterbury Tales by Chaucer" discusses several characters that represented the extremes of the society in which Chaucer lived.... The characters present their stories as a means of entertainment during the long ride with the object being the one with the best tale wins a free dinner at the next hostel stop....
9 Pages (2250 words) Book Report/Review

Daisy Miller: The incongruity between reality and appearance

Costello, however, would not agree because she thought the millers were common.... That evening, Daisy and Winterbourne planned to go out on the lake, much to the horror οf Eugenio, the millers' traveling companion, who was more like a member οf the family than a courier....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Material And The Spiritual In Beowulf And The Millers Tale

This essay "The Material And The Spiritual In Beowulf And The Miller's Tale" discusses how Beowulf and the Miller's Tale provide a graphic insight into the social order of Anglo Saxon England and from a literary historicism perspective have been interpreted as providing an attempt to better understand intellectual history through literature....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Key Debates Surrounding Cultural Policy in Relation to the Cultural Value

4), the ideas of such a group are compelled to be expressed in an ideal form by giving them a universal form and representing them as the only ideas that are valid or rational.... "The Key Debates Surrounding Cultural Policy in Relation to the Cultural Value" paper aims at critically analyzing the key debates surrounding cultural policy in relation to cultural value, social exclusion, and academic approaches to cultural policy....
9 Pages (2250 words) Literature review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us