StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Conflict of Laws - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
"The Conflict of Laws" paper states that English law engages in the conflict process because it would be unjust to treat the international case as a domestic one and apply to it the rules of domestic law, is disregard of other systems connected to the case and may have an interest in the solution…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.2% of users find it useful
The Conflict of Laws
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Conflict of Laws"

The Conflict of Laws Nationality means a person’s allegiance to a particular as a citizen or as a member of that state. Apart from stateless persons, everyone is the subject of some state to which they owe political allegiance and loyalty, for which they should be called upon to fight, pay taxes and support, and from which they may expect protection. These are broad general statements only. For instance, although we say that all persons must be national subjects of some state or other, it is true that due to upheavals of war there are some unfortunate stateless persons who have been disowned by or expelled from, their country of birth and origin (Barker and Padfied, p 75). Nationality is of great importance in fostering freedom and rights of individuals in public law. Thus, British citizens enjoy universal freedom, for instance, the right to vote at local and parliamentary elections. Aliens in Britain have no much right. They are subject to certain restrictions concerning entry into United Kingdom and employment after entry; furthermore they must register certain particulars with the police (Briggs, p 123). Citizens of the European Union, however, have a right to freedom of movement within the state ad are not subject to the same restrictions as other aliens. Apart from these requirements, English law treats aliens in much the same way as ordinary British subjects: for example, they are subject to the same rules of criminal law and the same laws of tort and contract (Barker and Padfied, p 75). Domicile is a quite different from the concept of nationality. Thus, a person may be British subject and yet be domiciled. Domicile is the legal relationship between an individual and a legal system of territory. The concept of domicile, under English law, involves two elements: actual residence; and the intention to remain in that place or country. Where these two elements co-exist, a person is said to have a domicile in that country. When a person gets domiciled in United Kingdom, certain assets are protected from the claim of their creditors. Such assets include their homestead, retirement plans, life insurance, annuities, assets held in a properly structured corporation, Limited Liability Company, and certain types of partnerships and, in many cases, wage accounts. This protection is generally unlimited; however many disadvantages of asset protection are not available or are limited when personal bankruptcy is involved (Briggs, p 123). Whereas nationality implies a political relation existing between a person and the state to which they owe allegiance; domicile determines important civil rights and obligations. Under the English law, it is inflexible to rule that every person must possess a domicile, and no person can have more than one domicile. A person is domiciled in the country he or she has a permanent home (Briggs, p 123). There are three classes of domicile. That is; domicile of origin, domicile of choice and domicile of dependent persons. Domicile of choice is where a person of full age and capacity establishes their home in a country with the intention of remaining there permanently, such country being different from their last domicile; they are regarded as acquiring a domicile of choice. Secondly, domicile of origin attaches at birth (Stone, p 295). A legitimate child takes the domicile of the father; an illegitimate child that of its mother. A foundling, deserted infant without known parent, acquires the domicile of the place where found. Finally, domicile of dependent person’s state that minors take the domicile of their parent (Barker and Padfied, p 75). Children may take their mother’s domicile instead of their father’s where the spouses are separated and the children make their home with their mother. A woman who marries normally acquires her husband’s domicile immediately on marriage. However, under the domicile and matrimonial Act, 1973; a married woman is now capable of acquiring a domicile independent of her husband. This statute also states that a person is capable of acquiring an independent domicile when they attain the age of sixteen (Clarkson and Hill, p 56). The problems arising from either nationality or domicile choice of law approaches have induced European courts and legislatures to search for other solutions. Some courts and legislatures have started to mitigate the sharp distinction between nationality and domicile by the notion that, over the years, a person might have lost a true social connection with his or her national law. Some courts therefore have ventured to substitute domicile for nationality whenever the law of the domicile appears to be the most closely connected law (O’Brien and Smith, p 6). In this manipulative way of dealing with conflicts, courts, in cross boundary family disputes, may either stress the intent of the parties to stay in the country of residence or the objective links that connect the situation with the host state in order to justify their preference for the law of the domicile over the national law of the parties? Or, they may instead prefer to emphasize nationality over domicile in order to achieve results that appear to be more appropriate to the particular circumstances of the case (Clarkson and Hill, p 56). The problems with this approach are that: first, it confers broad powers on the courts without providing guidance on how to use these powers correctly; and, second, it determines predictability because the case decisions are so highly individualized that they have little precedential value. There is the need to advocate for party autonomy in conflict issues involving immigrant disputes (Stone, p 295). The controversy with regard to nationality and domicile goes back to the notorious question of the remarriage of divorces when, the native country of one of the partners failed to recognize the legality of a prior divorce. This is an issue that for the last thirty years has proved troublesome in all legal systems in Europe whose conflict of law rules were geared to the national law principle (Stone, p 295). Muslims originating from countries that officially adhere to Islam do not lose their nationality of origin, not even after having acquired a new nationality of the country of residence. Secondly, most Muslims who are actually living in Europe demonstrably keep in touch with their countries of origin, including investing their savings there, spending long yearly holidays with family that remained there and even choosing fiancée. Therefore, multiple citizenship is not easy to apply to Muslims (Stone, p 295). According to Potz and Wieshaide (p, 30), in the better law approach, both nationality and domicile become soft connecting factors with considerably more manipulative potential. Courts may either stress the intent of the parties to stay in the country of residence, or the objective links that connect the situation with the host state, in order to justify their preference for the law of the domicile over the personal law of the parties. They may instead prefer to emphasize nationality over domicile in order to achieve results that appear to be more appropriate to the particular circumstances of the case. In their search for more harmonious solutions, some courts have come to mediate the sharp distinction between nationality and domicile. Instead, it is proposed that a person might have lost a true social connection with his or her national law. Some lower courts therefore come to substitute domicile for nationality whenever the law of the domicile appears to be the most closely connected law. Some legislatures have come to approve of this view, specifically in instances of divorce. Nationality is displaced as the primary concerning factor in case either spouse in a divorce no longer has a true social connection with his or her country of citizenship (Briggs, p 123). Freedom of choice appears to be eminently suitable for legal relationships that involve persons having different nationalities or in cases where one or both have dual citizenship. For example, spouses who no longer share the same nationality, which law is to be applied to their divorce? The option to make a deliberate choice in favor of one legal system thus warrants a predictable choice of law result. The same is true of the possibility for recognition of illegitimate children. Conclusion The merger of nationality in domicile, that a disputed domicile is one of the most difficult topics which were presented to the investigation of courts of justice, while the claims which are based on nationality demand immediate action from diplomatic agents, often at a distance from all such proofs as are alleged in cases of disputed domicile, and almost always without the time to investigate them if they were present. It is therefore essential, that questions of nationality should continue of such simple investigation as is comprised in the question “Does nationality you claim belong to you by birth?” if not, where are the papers of naturalization? (Briggs, p 123). For the moment, it can be said that English law engages in the conflict process because it would be unjust to treat international case as a domestic one and apply to it the rules of domestic law, is disregard of other legal systems which are clearly connected to the case and may have a proper interest in the solution. It would be wrong to treat parties, who have acted under one legal system, as if they acted under another and to make their rights and status depend on the accident of the forum (O’Brien and Smith, p 8). Works cited Barker David and Padfied Frank. Law. London, Elsevier, 2002. Pp 75-77. Briggs Adrian. The conflict of laws. Oxford, oxford university press, 2008. Pp 120-125. Clarkson Christopher and Hill Jonathan. The conflict of laws. Oxford, oxford university press, 2006. Pp 56-60. O’Brien John and Smith Raymond. Conflict of laws. London, Routledge, 1999. P 5-10. Potz Richard and Wieshaider Wolfgang. Islam and the European eunion. London, Peeters Publishers, 2004. P 30. Stone Peter. EU private international Law: harmonization of laws. London, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006. P 394-396. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The Conflict of Laws Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
The Conflict of Laws Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/law/1748293-domicile-in-its-present-form-is-a-concept-whose-time-is-past-in-the-19th-century-when-english-courts-were-trying-to-decide-between-nationality-and-domicile-the-concept-of-domicile-which-then-obtained-was-much-more-like-the-concept-of-habitual-residen
(The Conflict of Laws Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
The Conflict of Laws Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1748293-domicile-in-its-present-form-is-a-concept-whose-time-is-past-in-the-19th-century-when-english-courts-were-trying-to-decide-between-nationality-and-domicile-the-concept-of-domicile-which-then-obtained-was-much-more-like-the-concept-of-habitual-residen.
“The Conflict of Laws Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/law/1748293-domicile-in-its-present-form-is-a-concept-whose-time-is-past-in-the-19th-century-when-english-courts-were-trying-to-decide-between-nationality-and-domicile-the-concept-of-domicile-which-then-obtained-was-much-more-like-the-concept-of-habitual-residen.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Conflict of Laws

Business Law - Exclusion Clauses and Unfair Contract Terms

Henry is a student that has been requested by his law teacher to get the latest edition of “Business law for dumb people”, by renowned author Harry Prince.... When Henry went back to the bookstore to get the book, soon after entering the bookstore a big pile of books that were… “The Learned Wig does not guarantee that product descriptions written or given verbally in this store are accurate, complete, reliable, Such advice is provided by The Learned Wig without constituting any representation or guarantee of any kind, express or implied, as to the information, content, materials, or products being sold in this store....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

International Contract jurisdiction hypothetical

The relevant portions of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (UCPR 1999) state that service is permitted outside Australia if the proceeding is related to a contract that is… ither made in Queensland, made by 1 or more parties carrying on business or residing in Queensland or governed by the law of Queensland (Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (124)(1)(g))....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Concept of Characteristic Performance in the Rome Convention

Pursuant to Section 1 and Schedule 1 of the Contracts (Applicable Law) Act of 1990, the Rome Convention has the force of law in the UK and other… Article 4(2)- states that “ with the reference to the stipulations of paragraph five of this Article four, it shall be construed that the contract is most closely linked with the country where the party who is to guarantee the ution of the terms of the contract which is the main feature of the contract , has , at the juncture of signing the contract , characteristic performance will be decided with his routine domicile, or ,in the case of a company or any incorporated body , its head administration office....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Continuous Relevance and Validity of Different FOB Contracts in English Common Law

FOB is an acronym for ‘Free ON Board', which indicates that the price of an item that has been ordered is inclusive of the delivery of the item to a certain point.... Using this term alongside a physical location entails the parties to make out the freight details and the point… The FOB falls into three types1; the strict or classic FOB, the FOB which has additional services and a simple FOB....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Private International Law

Companies Act 2006 also applies in this case; because Bratwurst GmbH and Havana entered into a contract, and was to sell some of their products in England; the England laws, therefore, govern the whole enterprise as well.... In this case, the Brussels regime fails to apply.... Thus, the traditional rules and commercial dispute apply....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Separability Used in Arbitration

TALISKER DISTILLERY: A STUDY IN The Conflict of Laws.... In England, the clause of arbitration legislation has been separate, and it is enshrined in the 1698 Arbitration Act.... The Act had been established to allow arbitration clauses to be part… However, in a case in England of Kill Verse Hollister a ruling (1746) was made that the arbitration clause was not in spirit with the 1698 Act, rendering it incapable of being enforced through the judicial process....
1 Pages (250 words) Coursework

Hague Visby Rules

This gives carriers an undue advantage and can be a source of conflict.... The paper "Hague Visby rules " says that it in maritime law relate to parties dealing with shipping goods by sea.... The rules apply to a number of states; however, the manner of implementation differs from state to state....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Andrew, Bob, Charlie and Davids Partnership

hellip; Many of the difficulties associated with The Conflict of Laws and the nature and legal status of a partnership can be overcome by an express partnership agreement with a choice of law clause in which the UK is the governing law.... "Andrew, Bob, Charlie, and David's Partnership" paper examines the legal nature of the partnership, the consequences for the partnership should David leave, identifies what can be done to avoid the problems that can arise under a partnership, and possible solutions before David leaves....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us