StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Treason Act of 1351 - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "The Treason Act of 1351" it is clear that other methods of resolution that Jonathan bypassed that could have prevented him from the charge of treason. While the International Criminal Court would not have been much help in Jonathan’s case…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.5% of users find it useful
The Treason Act of 1351
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Treason Act of 1351"

The ability and responsibility to promote human rights rests on everyone’s shoulders; but what is acceptable behavior in attempting to prevent a terrible act from occurring, and what is rightfully considered treason? And in terms of ruling courts of law, who should decide what is and is not acceptable? The Treason Act of 1351 was originally written in Norman French, and has gone through several revisions. The Fifth Statute defines treason in the following manner: “II. ITEM, Whereas divers Opinions have been before this Time in what Case Treason shall be said, and in what not;1 the King, at the Request of the Lords and of the Commons, hath made a Declaration in the Manner as hereafter followeth, that is to say; When a Man doth compass or imagine the Death of our Lord the King, or of our Lady his Queen or of their eldest Son and Heir; or if a Man do violate the King’s companion, or the King’s eldest Daughter unmarried, or the Wife, the King’s eldest Son and Heir; or if a Man do levy War against our Lord the King in his Realm, or be adherent to the King’s Enemies in his Realm, giving to them Aid and Comfort in the Realm,…” 1 The scenario of Jonathan the postal worker asks several vital questions. 1) Is it treasonable to try and stop your country from committing a terrible act, such as the act of mass murder; 2) were Jonathan’s actions in trying to solve the dilemma acceptable; and 3) which other authoritative bodies could have successfully, or not successfully, stopped the criminal act of mass murder? Answering these questions requires examination of the elements that make up the treason act, and the actions in question. There is strong evidence to support the argument that none of Jonathan’s actions, nor the intent behind them, meets the definition of treason. Though the Act has gone through several changes since 1351, the four offenses that initially made up the Treason Act remain in tact, and in the case of Jonathan, deserve analysis. The first two offenses revolve around participating in the death of and/or purposely violating the Queen and her companion. Jonathan’s actions do not indicate that he had any intention of violating or bringing about the death of the Queen, or anyone else associated with the Crown. The third offense stated under the Treason Act is levying war against the Queen. Nothing in Jonathan’s scenario remotely suggests that he was waging war of any kind. In fact, because the scenario provides access to Jonathan’s thought process, the argument could be made that he was very much against warring actions of any kind, and was very much conflicted as to what to do about it. The fourth offense of the Treason Act is adhering to enemies of the Crown, and/or giving them aid or comfort. Jonathan’s actions fall just short of this offense, but it is the point that requires the most examination. Although Great Britain and China share a past comprised of political animosity and ideological disaccord, the status of their current relationship is not that of enemies. Current world events, such as the return of Hong Kong to the Chinese government, and a shared membership in the Security Council, which seemingly finds it difficult to sanction countries that use aggression against its own citizens, might even suggest that the two countries have, in fact, placed themselves in a sort of alliance or understanding. There may still be residual resentment on the part of China from the British occupation of Hong Kong, and other historical political events, but it can not be said that the two countries are at war with each other. China still maintains its own political ideology, however. Even though it has somewhat softened on business and industry, China has a long way to go before its position and actions in human rights and natural rights are deemed favorable by western countries such as Great Britain and the United States. Still, merely having political ideas in disagreement does not make two countries enemies. Therefore, Jonathan’s actions were not those of someone conspiring with or supporting an enemy of the Crown. Having covered the four offenses, as stated in the Fifth Statute, Jonathan is not guilty of treason. That does not exonerate him, however. Jonathan’s actions cannot be seen as an acceptable resolution, because they had significant political and economic consequences that were three fold. While several corrupt political figures were forced to resign, his decision to hand over the letters to the Chinese Embassy inadvertently cost the UK the island of Jenicki, a dependent territory, and deflated any plans the UK had of securing leasing funds from their ally, the United States. While none of these considerations occurred to Jonathan, he should have refrained from interfering with international political affairs, and should answer for such, but only in scale to the other involved parties, whose only penalty was forced resignation. In fact, one could make the argument that, according to Article 8 of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, if an individual can be found guilty of crimes he committed simply by following the orders of a superior or by going along with the intentions of superiors, it is then safe to say that a person has a moral and legal duty to question orders and intentions from superiors that are of a criminal nature. In the book, Human Rights and the Moral Responsibilities of Corporate and Public Sector Organizations, 2 The views of Tom Campbell and Seumas Miller on human rights support the findings of the IMT at Nuremberg. They state, “In the case of human rights laws in particular, the moral obligations of non-government agents may be broadly construed as requiring the utilization of the means at their disposal to further the same objectives: realizing human rights. Individuals should not only refrain from violating the human rights of others, but they may be expected to join in persuading others to do likewise, to do what they can to prevent infringements of human rights and to promote human rights objectives.” There were several other authoritative bodies of government in which that Jonathan could have confided, besides going to the Chinese Embassy. The first and obvious choice would have been his postal superiors in upper management, who, as government authorities themselves, would have been duty bound to review the letters and report the issue to the proper authorities. Seeing as to how the letters involved members of the Ministry of Defense, it is understandable why Jonathan did not go there. He could, however, have gone to Scotland Yard, and turned the letters over to the London Metropolitan Police,3 who 1) were not implemented in the letters, and thus 2) also would have known whom to hand the case over to. Jonathan did not go to the American Embassy for a similar reason. While the letters give no indication as to whether or not the United States had knowledge of the events slated to unfold, the letters did name the United States as a party eager to lease the island of Jenicki from the British government for political and military gain, and thus, America too had to be seen as a probable conspirator in Jonathans eyes. One has to wonder why Jonathan would not choose to go to the British Embassy, since that was yet another governmental body that was not mentioned in the letters. Had he done so, Jonathan would have successfully prevented the occurrence of mass murder, and would never have been charged with treason. The International Criminal Court was established to oversee the prosecution of those charged with heinous international crimes against humanity, when those crimes were not sufficiently address in their native country. Though a powerful institution, it most likely would not have had the ability to prosecute only the planning of a crime, and thus, would have been useless. The Court does have authority, however, to respond to current events involving crimes against humanity, and has done so. Citing a threat to international security and peace, in May 2005,4 the UN Security Council called for the war crimes committed in Darfur to be investigated by the ICC. In 2007, Ahmed Harun and Ali Kushayb were charged with war crimes committed in the years 2003 and 2004, but because the Sudan has not ratified the Rome Statute, it has neither cooperated with the ICC nor recognized its authority. The Court can still prosecute members of government and political leaders, such as Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, who has consistently denied the existence of war crimes in Darfur, a part of western Sudan, even in the face of murder and extermination of countless of helpless people. In March 2009, the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Bashir, citing rape, torture, murder, extermination, and forcible transferring large numbers of civilians. As with the previous Sudanese cases, nothing has come of it from the officials in Sudan, but if Bashir travels outside of his realm, he could very well be apprehended to face those charges in the International Criminal Court. In conclusion, Jonathans actions do not render him a traitor, because they do not satisfy the elements of treasonable offenses, but his actions cannot be deemed acceptable. There were other methods of resolution that Jonathan bypassed that could have prevented him from the charge of treason. While the International Criminal Court would not have been much help in Jonathan’s case, they do have authoritative standing in current cases of war criminality across the globe. __________________________________________________________ 1. Treason Act 1351, c. 2 25_Edw_Stat_5. 2. Campbell, Tom, Seumas Miller, Human Rights and the Moral Responsibilities of Corporate and Public Sector Organisations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 2004, p.17. 3. Metropolitan Police Authority, Home Page, retrieved 21 March 2009, . 4. International Federation for Human Rights, retrieved 21 March 2009, . Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(The Treason Act of 1351 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
The Treason Act of 1351 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/history/1721436-treason-act-1351
(The Treason Act of 1351 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
The Treason Act of 1351 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/history/1721436-treason-act-1351.
“The Treason Act of 1351 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/history/1721436-treason-act-1351.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Treason Act of 1351

Analysis of Legal Investigation

Legal Research Your name Faculty Course Location Legal Research The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) is a global judicial organ, formed under the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights to observe the protection of human rights by countries.... hellip; The Grand Chamber judgement in the case of Vo V France can be located in the following site: Grand Chamber Judgement A, B and C v....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Way of Telling Lies and the Consequences

To many people, lying is not wrong – though wrong in many times, thus, not always a wrongful act.... … Lying is most likely the most common wrongful act that individuals carry out on a daily basis, making it more of an unavoidable part of the human nature in the individual.... Other reasons for lying include lying so as to identify with certain groups, so as to act as examples for others, for example the case of a parent who tells children lies – that they were brilliant in school, so that the children can work harder....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Contract Assignment

They must determine what form applies, if any, or, alternately, that neither form applies and by default, a given contractual dispute must be resolved by recourse to the Sale of Goods act rather than by the terms and conditions set out by either firm.... (“Sale of Goods act C.... was held to be valid In lieu of a specific contract the court relied on the “Sale of Goods act, 1979”....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Approaches to State Welfare Provision

In 1834, the Poor Law Amendment act was adopted and this minimised the political power of farmers who were hiring labour leading to a reduction in relief expenditure (Marshall 1985).... Under the Poor Law Amendment act 1834, parishes were grouped into Poor Law unions and by 1839, many of them had been grouped and had already built or were constructing workhouses.... Under the Poor Law Amendment act 1834, various orders were issued and this includes the 1842 Outdoor Labour Test Order and the 1844 Outdoor Relief Prohibitory Order....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Labor Force from the Household Survey

The government has to decisively act to save jobs that are about to be lost and to generate more.... In the research paper “Labor Force from the Household Survey,” the author answers the question: what was the official unemployment rate reported for January 2013 and the total number of unemployed workers and what was the labor force participation rate....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The History of Crimes

For instance, if we talk about crimes and criminals, the act of murder involves the killing of a person but not all killings have the same motives.... Since we have a reasonable way to predict the reactions of that person when exposed to certain situations, we are more likely to be able to anticipate such actions and effective foil any act that may cause harm.... This coursework "The History of Crimes" focuses on the importance of understanding why it is very important to learn from past experiences and looks into the area of crimes specifically rape, treason and criminal women as well as the areas of penalty, prison and capital punishment....
12 Pages (3000 words) Coursework

The European Court of Human Rights

This work called "Legal Research" focuses on the range of the application of the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 2), regarding the unborn fetus.... The author takes into account the jurisprudence of the ECHR on a country's duty to life protection in view of both charitable and involuntary, neglectful extinction of pregnancies....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

America's Medical System is or is not Broken

The paper will intend to focus on the various aspects related to the healthcare system of the US.... It's important to highlight that the various concerns and arguments in relation to the concerned system will also be highlighted in order to assess the soundness of the system.... hellip; This essay discusses that the health-care system of the United States (US) was learned to be stated as 'broken' and is known to have undergone just a few enhancements with regard to the overall system....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us