StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Conflict Negotiation and Problem-Solving - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The essay "Conflict Negotiation and Problem-Solving" focuses on the critical analysis of the major issues on conflict negotiation and problem-solving in the organization. Problem-oriented communication means that conversation should focus on solving the problem…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.5% of users find it useful
Conflict Negotiation and Problem-Solving
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Conflict Negotiation and Problem-Solving"

Organizational Behavior 3 ID Number & Total Number of Words 503 Lesson 8 – Conflict negotiation and problem solving 1. The seven attributes of “supportive communication” includes: (1) problem oriented, not person oriented; (2) descriptive, not evaluative; (3) specific, not general; (4) conjunctive, not disjunctive; (5) validating, not demeaning; (6) owned, not disowned; and (7) two-way, not one way (Denhardt, Denhardt, & Aristigueta, 2009, pp. 247 – 249). Problem-oriented communication means that conversation should focus on solving the problem. Since there is a huge difference from being objective and subjective, negotiators should refrain from analyzing the negative attitude or character of the person who causes the problem. By focusing on discussing the problem, both parties can have a better chance to solve the problem. Descriptive communication is all about being able to accurately and objectively describe the problem. In other words, negotiators should avoid judging or labeling a person for their behavior. Aside from focusing on solutions to the problem, negotiators should be able to maintain his/her objectivity when describing the event. Speaking in general terms can trigger miscommunication. To avoid misrepresenting the problem, negotiators should be specific when managing the problem. In general, specific communication means that negotiators should communicate in such a way that they will be clearly understood by the receiver of the message. In other words, they should speak direct to the point. Disjunctive communication is all about taking all the time to speak out one’s own thoughts without letting the other person express what they think. On the other hand, conjunctive communication is all about being able to initiate a conversation that flows smoothly. Therefore, when solving a problem, negotiators should make use of conjunctive communication and not disjunctive ones. For example, negotiator should avoid asking further questions before the other party completes his/her last sentence. Invalidating communication can make the receiver of the messages feel ignored, alienated, or worthless. On the other hand, validating communication is all about making the other party feel understood, valued, accepted, and recognized. Therefore, when solving a problem, negotiators should make use of validating communication and not invalidating ones. In most cases, this can be done by trying to avoid criticizing the other person. Owned communication is all about taking the responsibility for one’s own statement. For example, “I told you that you need to rest early”. Using the word “I” already indicate ownership of the statement. Similar to invalidating communication, the use of a one-way communication method can make the other party feel ignored, alienated, or worthless. Therefore, to encourage the other person to participate in a win-win negotiation process, negotiators should make it a habit to practice a two-way communication. In general, two-way communication means that the other person is given enough time to respond and participate in sharing their own thoughts and comments about a given topic. To do so, negotiators should learn to become a supportive listener. 2. The conflict presented in the video entitled “Duel at the Mall” started when the lady unconsciously bumped the car door of another person in the parking lot. Instead of apologizing for her mistake, the lady arrogantly responded the other party’s tone was not called for and that accidentally bumping her car will not hurt the re-sale value of the other person’s car (You Tube, 2008). In other words, conflict started when their communication became person-oriented rather than problem-oriented. 3. The four points of principled negotiation includes: (1) separate the people from the problem; (2) focus on interests, not positions; (3) invent options for mutual gain; and (4) insist on objective criteria (Denhardt, Denhardt, & Aristigueta, 2009, pp. 327 – 328). To resolve the conflict situation between the two ladies, both of them should learn how to separate people from the problem. It means that the lady who accidentally hit the car of another person should learn to acknowledge that she was the root cause of the conflict. Aside from being objective to the situation, the lady who accidentally hit the car of another person should focus on how she could develop a win-win situation for both of them. It means that she should kindly apologize to the other lady instead of showing an arrogant attitude and pretend that she did not make any mistake. Doing so will make the other person feel better instead of being angered. Lesson 9 – Leadership There are differences between a traditional and contemporary leadership approach. In general, traditional leadership approach involve leaders that are focused on the use of authoritative power in guiding the rest of the team members to accomplish a goal whereas the use of contemporary leadership approach is more focused on encouraging the rest of the group members to contribute and actively participate in accomplishing a goal. The use of contemporary leadership approach motivate each team members in developing their own talent and skills whereas the use of traditional leadership approach restrict the team members from becoming one of the best future leaders within the organization. Lastly, leaders of contemporary leadership approach direct the team members whereas leaders of traditional leadership approach inspire the team members to become self-sufficient in their own little ways (Denhardt, Denhardt, & Aristigueta, 2002, p. 211). 2.i As compared to men, the two forms of prejudice that tend to occur when there is a perceived incongruence between female gender roles and typical leader roles include the fact that most women are often being subjected to a “less favorable evaluation of with regards to their potential leadership and actual leadership behavior” (Eagley & Johannesen-Schmidt, 2001, p. 785). 2.ii.a To the extent that a leader role is more congruent with the male than female gender role, men were more task-oriented, and men were considered more effective in the leader role. Men as leaders are better in terms of using the transactional leadership style (Eagley & Johannesen-Schmidt, 2001, p. 793). Furthermore, men are more inclined to think rationally as compared to women (Eagly & Johnson, 1990). Therefore, male leaders are better in terms of making logical decision-making as compared to female leaders. For example, male leaders are better in terms of staying focused on identifying the team members’ mistakes as compared to the female leaders, etc. To the extent that a leader role was more congruent with the female than male gender role, women were more task-oriented, and women were considered more effective in the leader role. Women as leaders are using transformational leadership style which makes them able to gain better influence among the team members. Likewise, these women are also better in terms of inspiring and motivating the team members as they consider the individuality of each person (Eagley & Johannesen-Schmidt, 2001, p. 791). Therefore, female managers are more effective in terms of making the team members feel respected and valued. Lesson 10 – Power and organizational politics Question No. A B 1 3 2 2 0 5 3 2 3 4 1 4 5 4 1 6 3 2 7 2 3 8 4 1 9 1 4 10 4 1 Total Score 24 26 Source: Denhardt, Denhardt, & Aristigueta, p. 214 The score shows that as a leader, I have the capacity to use both transactional leadership style (score = 24) and transformational leadership style (score = 26). In general, having the flexibility with regards to the use of both transactional and transformational leadership approach is more beneficial as compared to the use of only a single form of leadership style. This statement is true because each type of scenario calls for different types of leadership in order for leaders to become effective in their leadership role. Q.1 Leaders that are classified as transformational leaders are the ones that do not practice positional authority. Therefore, to gain more power within an organization or a company, I intend to use transformational leadership style. In general, transformational leadership style is characterized by having charisma or the ability to influence other people, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individual consideration (Denhardt, Denhardt, & Aristigueta, 2002, p. 202; Bass, 1998). For this reason, the use of this particular leadership approach will help me win the trust and respect of people I work with within a business organization. By winning their trust and respect, I could easily use my authoritative power in a manner that will benefit me as a leader. Q.2 Political issues within a business organization are inevitable. In general, effective leadership is not about the use of authoritative power but more on being able to influence other people. With this in mind, effective leadership should be able to develop a good communication skill when managing and responding to organizational politics. Through the use of effective communication skills, leaders could take the opportunity to sit down and talk with different parties involved in an organizational politics. By listening carefully to the main concerns of each party, the leader will be able to know how he/she could come up with a win-win solution for all. Using this strategy, the leader can effectively solve organizational politics. Q.3 To become an organizational politician, it is important for me to win the trust and respect of other people within the organization. Basically, this strategy is possible through the use of effective leadership style and communication skills. By winning other people’s loyalty and long-term support, it will be easier for me to establish and implement a new set of goal(s) that are beneficial to me and the rest of the stakeholders. References Bass, B. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact. . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates. Denhardt, R., Denhardt, J., & Aristigueta, M. (2002). Managing Human Behavior in Public & Nonprofit Organizations. CA: Sage Publications. Denhardt, R., Denhardt, J., & Aristigueta, M. (2009). Managing human behavior in public and nonprofit organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. Eagley, A., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781-797. Eagly, A., & Johnson, B. (1990). Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-257. You Tube. (2008). Retrieved July 8, 2012, from Duel at the Mall: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBvysuewIOs Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Organizational Behavior 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Organizational Behavior 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1599377-organizational-behavior-3
(Organizational Behavior 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Organizational Behavior 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1599377-organizational-behavior-3.
“Organizational Behavior 3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1599377-organizational-behavior-3.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Conflict Negotiation and Problem-Solving

Fishers Book Getting to Yes or Getting Past No

The book talks about principled negotiation to resolve any kind of conflict, first published in 1981 by Roger Fisher and William Ury and Patton, the writers founded the first negotiation program at Harvard Law School and their teachings about effective negotiations are greatly accepted World Wide.... This book brings out the key features of a principled negotiation.... A wise agreement meets the legitimate interests of each party in the negotiation, it results in a fair and durable resolution, takes community's interests into account, and the process is efficient and amicable....
5 Pages (1250 words) Book Report/Review

The Importance of Negotiation in the Development of the Conflict

Recommendations were given in carrying out effective negotiation and communication approaches that are needed in conflict resolution.... This essay "The Importance of negotiation in the Development of the Conflict" presents the key concepts and ideas that a negotiator needs in mediating conflicts between person/s and departments.... The need for conflict management and negotiation approach has been detected as the given situation has been analyzed....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The analysis of Negotiations

Selecting a Model for negotiation ... ccording to Cohen , “negotiation is a field of knowledge and endeavor that focuses on gaining the favor of people from whom we want things”.... ?? When preparing for negotiations, it is best to guide the flow of our arguments and counter arguments by selecting a model for negotiation.... Creating and claiming value are considered as two of the most basic things when it comes to negotiation....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Negotiating for a Borderless World

negotiation skills are a must to survive.... n 2001, the Doha Round declaration paved a way for the creation of mandates on the negotiation of a variety of trade issues by the Trade Negotiations Committee (WTO, 2001).... s discussed in class, negotiations are made for many reasons: to divide resources, to create something new and to resolve any conflict among parties.... Negotiations always involve at least two parties, a conflict that needs to be resolved, and a give and take process....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Role of Negotiation & Mediation

In the paper 'Role of negotiation & Mediation' the author focuses on neutral, which has a very important role to play in solving a conflict and restores the damaged relationships between disputing parties by listening to their views and bringing them together and clarifying misperceptions.... In another method, the neutral called a convener has to solve the conflict by bringing the parties to a stage where they can come up with a solution.... e all have gone through the situation where different people come up with different ideas and goals and needs to have come into conflict....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Analysis of Constituents, Complexities of Negotiation

From the paper "Analysis of Constituents, Complexities of negotiation" it is clear that negotiating parties start with co-operation to create some values and then compete with each other to claim these values.... Therefore negotiation is creating values and claiming it.... The role of behaviour, the act of how you handle each situation and issues with your speech and actions is one of the most important factors in influencing the outcome of the negotiation....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Hostages - Crisis Negotiations

Since then, several negotiation strategies have been developed for application in hostage situations, mainly based on problem-solving methods to respond, resolve, and management of these incidences.... The paper "Hostages - Crisis Negotiations" explains a crisis occurs in four predictable stages: pre-crisis, crisis, negotiation, and resolution.... One is required to use proper negotiation strategies in order to secure the release of captives, be it in a hostage or non-hostage situation....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Conflict and Negotiation in Organisations

This paper "Conflict and negotiation in Organisations" evaluates the views and process of conflict.... It further evaluates negotiation as a conflict resolution strategy, evaluating the process, how individual differences influence it and the role of third parties.... negotiation is a strategy that has been adopted to resolve conflicts (Miller, 2012).... In the modern business environment, the conflict remains widely rampant....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us