StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Sovereignty of Parliament in the UK - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "The Sovereignty of Parliament in the UK" it is clear that the last few years have seen the United Kingdom undergoing a series of insightful constitutional changes. During the tenure of the Labour Party from 1997-to 2010, many constitutional reforms were introduced in the UK. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.9% of users find it useful
The Sovereignty of Parliament in the UK
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Sovereignty of Parliament in the UK"

? How far the reforms introduced by the last labour government enhance or detract from the rule of law, democratic accountability or the sovereignty of parliament in the U.K. The last few years has seen United Kingdom undergoing a series of insightful constitutional changes. During the tenure of the Labour Party from 1997-2010, many constitutional reforms were introduced in UK. One criticism that has been bought against the Labour party’s reform agenda is that it was not well-synchronized and there were no definite set of guiding principles behind it but it is already clear, going by the impact of this change over the last decade that the British democracy has changed for good. The changes have bought positive impacts from the view point of parliamentary democracy, parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law. Two such reforms, introduced under the Labour Party reform agenda, are the House of Lords act, 1999 and Freedom of Information, 2000. The former reform was introduced with the goal to make the House of Lord more representative as well as democratic whereas the later was created to make the government operations more open and increase the democracy and sovereignty of the nation1. UK is a nation that follows parliamentary democracy i.e. the members who form the government body are also members of either of the two Houses of the Parliament (though there are a very few exceptions to this) and, the government of Britain is answerable to the Parliament as it owes its very existence to the Parliament. The Parliament of UK is also a sovereign parliament i.e. the legislative body is superior to any other government body inclusive of executive or judicial bodies. In the United Kingdom, it is the Parliament which decides the laws and the work of the judges is to interpret it. They cannot themselves make a law2. Under the House of Lords reform, the right to sit and vote held by the hereditary peers was to be ended but the legislative powers of the House of Lords was to remain the same. No particular political party would then have majority in the House of Lords and its composition will be a reflection of the percentage of votes cast in the last General Election. When the first phase of this reform came, all but 92 of the then present hereditary peers were removed from the House of Lords. 3 This law positively affects the British democracy, as proposed by many scholars. According to the result of a poll, the British MPs too have favored a fully elected House of Lords in comparison to the traditional composition citing that a step like that will have a major impact on the British constitutional reform. The government of Britain was previously divided into commons and the lords i.e. the there existed a “lower house” or popularly the “House of Common” which comprised of elected members and on the other hand there existed the “upper house” or the “House of Lords” who were unelected. The Lords believed themselves to be privileged who had either been put to the coveted seat by their fathers who sat on those chairs in the past or by the ruling party of their time. This arrangement was totally in contrast with the idea of democracy. The ultimate decision making power used to rest with the Lords and only when their decisions differed considerably with those of the Commons, the attempt to rule out those decisions used to be made. This highlights the existence of a large section of society with no important voice in the legislative process of the nation. This shows a democratic split. In a truly democratic country, problems like this would have never emerged. Therefore, it can be said that the House of Lords Act, 1999 was a step towards enhancing the democracy of the nation. (Britain’s Deficient Democracy) The reformed House of Lords is more confident, authoritative and it is broadly a representation of the society it seeks to serve. It contains people from different parts of the United Kingdom, from varied professions, from all ethnic and religious communities, both men and women and hence it will be better from the democratic point of view. It aims to add substance to both parliamentary democracy and increased accountability of the executives of United Kingdom4. The House of Lords Act also enhances the Rule of Law, which states that the rights which have been given to any individual are set legal rules and are not the mere wish of the authorities. Whether a person is at fault with a law or not will be decided by the court alone and the punishment will be same for everyone irrespective of their position in the society. The success of Rule of Law depends mainly on the impartiality of the judges. By making House of Lord more diversified, the probability of proper implementation of the Rule of Law increases. Again, the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005 greatly changed the rights and responsibilities of the Lord Chancellor and also changed the process of judicial appointment in England. It also led to the birth of a new Supreme Court which was to replace the appellate committee of the House of Lords along with the Privy Council’s judicial committee5. Another major reform during that period was the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It gave the public the right to access information which was previously held by the public authorities alone. The question asked can be on any subject and unless there is a very good reason, the public body needs to provide the information in not more than 20 official working days. This right is not an end in itself but a means to the end. When this reform was introduced, there was uncertainty regarding the fact that to what extent will the “open government and participatory democracy” be useful in meeting the ultimate objective. The main reason behind this was that Britain has always had excessive confidentiality and this used to suit the ministers and policy makers alike but used to deprive the citizen of Britain from certain rights to information, which had for decades been taken for granted in nations like United States and Sweden. Again, on the other hand, there are certain sections of government like Ministry of Defense, Intelligence and Home Officers who will not be willing to part information and support “open government”. Therefore, Britain has undergone slow and steady transition from the “official secrecy to freedom to information”6. This Act has increased the sovereignty of parliament. FOI (Freedom of Information) Act has increased the regular supervision of the government because of the questions raised by the citizens as well as the ministers. The government has become more accountable. The individuals have been given the power to hold the people who are in power accountable for their actions and the presence of Information Commissioner, who is independent and not under some ministers and looks into the cases where information has been denied, further helps the cause. Moreover, the incidence where the expenses incurred on the MPs had been revealed, has removed the doubts that were initially there regarding the effectiveness of the Freedom of Information Act7. According to Professor Philip Cowley, the government’s check on the proper working of the nation and the role of the House of Commons has increased like never before. This has increased the efficiency of the system and has reduced the chances of corruption considerably. Most scholars have welcomed this legislation which is promoting the culture of openness of governmental work and policy making. If people will be informed about the political decisions and rules that will have an impact on their lives, then the democratic process of the nation will improve. It will no longer be easy for anyone, be it the politicians or other officials to make adjustments to suit personal interests. Therefore, this reform is a step towards a more democratic nation8. By reviewing the constitutional reforms which were introduced by the Labor Government during the period of 1997-2010, it can be said that this period has been very important from the point of view of constitutional change in Britain. The impact of both House of Lords Act and the Freedom of Information Act has had positive impact on the sovereignty of parliament, democratic accountability as well as the rule of law. References 1) Seidle, F.L. and Docherty, D.C., Reforming parliamentary democracy, Canada: McGill-Queen’s Press, 2003 2) Turpin, C. and Tomkins, A., British Government and the Constitution: Text and Materials, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011 3) Overview of the UK system of government, directgov, retrieved on Oct. 15, 2011 from: http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Governmentcitizensandrights/UKgovernment/Centralgovernmentandthemonarchy/DG_073438 4) Britain’s Deficient democracy, Centre for Citizenship, 2011, retrieved on Oct. 15,2011 from: http://www.centreforcitizenship.org/demdef.html 5) Would a wholly elected House of Lords strengthen British democracy?, The Telegraph, 2007, retrieved on Oct. 15,2011 from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/yourview/1544817/Would-a-wholly-elected-House-of-Lords-strengthen-British-democracy.html 6) Freedom of Information Act 2000- progress Towards Implementation: Oral and written evidence, Britain: Stationery Office, 2004 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1433661-how-far-the-reforms-introduced-by-the-last-labour
(Reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1433661-how-far-the-reforms-introduced-by-the-last-labour.
“Reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1433661-how-far-the-reforms-introduced-by-the-last-labour.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Sovereignty of Parliament in the UK

Transformation of Democracy in the UK

The paper "Transformation of Democracy in the uk" tells that the constitutional arrangements of the United Kingdom primarily underpin the functionalities of the nation.... The strengths of the constitution in the uk disembark from the Crown and reside with the government and parliament.... Transformation of Democracy in the uk It had been observed that several western European nations perceived increasing attention for intensifying citizens' involvement and encouragement in strategy decisions....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Is the UK Parliament Still Legally Sovereign

British officials claim that the dominant characteristic of the political institutions in the United Kingdom is the sovereignty of the Parliament.... 5 Over the recent years, the sovereignty of the British Parliament has been regarded as out of date and in dire need to restoration.... Is the uk Parliament still legally sovereign today?... Some critics state that the British Parliament has enjoyed limited sovereignty throughout the history of the uk....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Constitutional and Administrative Law (Parliament Sovereignty in UK)

Further, no individual or entity is acknowledged by the law of England as having a right to overrule or refute the legislation of parliament.... These features do not essentially undercut the doctrine of parliament sovereignty, at least theoretically, as the legislature could repeal any of the law carrying out these transformations.... It is very much witnessed that parliament is sovereign in the United Kingdom, the only question is, is its supremacy declining?...
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Evolution of Constitutional, Administrative Law and Human Rights

Additionally, the judiciary obtains their power from the Crown and there is a distinct overlap of functions between the powers, which should be separated for the effective application of the separation of powers and the efficacy of parliament as a check on the executive6.... his obfuscation of the theoretical separation of powers has ramifications for the procedure of passing Acts of parliament.... This is further compounded by the fact that the Prime Minister and Cabinet ministers are parliament members and part of the legislature and the Prime Minister is head of the executive....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

How Important Is Parliamentary Sovereignty in the United Kingdom

Parliamentary sovereignty in the uk can be overturned for what is perceived as the greater good, as it was by the European Parliament.... Only those he personally invited would attend as described on the web page of the United Kingdom parliament under the heading Birth of the English parliament.... These two would later come together as parliament ( a place to speak) – the House of Lords and the House of Commons, although the term was first used in 1236 to describe a meeting between the king and his nobles and prelates....
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework

Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty

According to the court in the case of Madzimbamuto v Lardner-Burke1, the sovereignty of the Parliament is a recognized fact and it has been so for many.... The devolution of the powers of the Parliament together with some laws and treaties put pressure on sovereignty the sovereignty of the Parliament.... n the other hand, the ratchet clauses in some EU Treaties allow the transfer of powers from the uk Parliament to the EU without the need to amend the treaty....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The Study of the Law of the Constitution

Encapsulated in this ideal is the theory that Parliament represents the supreme law of the uk.... As a result, the uk's constitution is idiosyncratic in the wider European context.... The discussion that follows examines these two vastly similar concepts of supremacy and demonstrates how it is idiosyncratic with respect to the uk's constitution.... Expounding upon these theories of the uk constitution, Sir William Wade that: '....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

The Structure of the United Kingdom Constitution

On the other hand, an example of a Constitution that is not entrenched is the uk Constitution.... There are moves by some quarters for a proposal to legally entrench the uk Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights, but there is doubt whether this can be done unless the fundamental rule of the uk Constitution is itself changed.... One of the characteristics of the uk Constitution is the absence of a single, unified document that enshrines it....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us