StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Bias of Environmental Impact Assessment - Essay Example

Summary
The paper "The Bias of Environmental Impact Assessment" states that certain steps must be taken to ensure that the process of EIA does contain appropriate checks and balances that would limit the omission of undesirable results and falsification or distortion of data. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.4% of users find it useful
The Bias of Environmental Impact Assessment
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Bias of Environmental Impact Assessment"

The Bias of Environmental Impact Assessment There has been much interest in sustainable development during the past decades. In light of the apparentenvironment degradation occurring globally, proposed development actions now require a systematic process that examines in advance their environmental impacts in order to make sure that these projects are amenable from an environmental perspective. Such a process looks into the significant effects of a project or development on the environment. These effects are identified, assessed and taken into account by the competent authority in the decision making process. Such a process is called Environmental Impact Assessment or EIA (Colombo, 1992). The need to conduct an EIA was initiated in Europe in 1975 when the European Commission stated that an EIA procedure should be drawn up and adopted under the second action programme (Sheate, 1994). Since then, EIA has not only served merely as a defensive tool to protect the environment but has also become a means to contribute to environmental sustainability in a more holistic manner with feedback loops to and from Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEA). EIA likewise provides provisions in considering location, design and environmental issues in parallel, potentially leading to improved relationship between the developer, the planning authority and the local community. The statutory requirements in the EIA process are generally designed such that they can be adapted to different situations and circumstances. As such, the EIA is a tool that constantly develops within countries’ institutional structures and the decisions made reflect their prevailing environmental politics (Sheate, 1994). When done right, EIA is indeed a very powerful tool that would limit the detrimental effects that most developmental projects contribute to the environment. Unfortunately, while EIA is a very promising concept in theory, it tends to become smoke and mirrors in practice, deceiving most stakeholders and not really achieving what it ought to accomplish in the first place. This is so because the effectiveness of an EIA is heavily influenced by the legislation of specific jurisdictions and the influence of affected development groups upon such legislation and so while EIA is such an attractive concept in theory, it fails miserably in reality. Environmental Impact Assessment follows a particular process. It starts with the screening of proposed developments to identify national environmental significance. This is followed by scoping to give involved parties the opportunity to take all principles of Environment and Sustainable Development (ESD) into consideration in order to identify the issues and impacts that are likely to be important and to establish terms of reference for EIA. This step should involve the identified stakeholders as well as the proponent to supposedly balance the interests of all involved. Then, alternatives are examined to give the proponent the opportunity to establish the preferred or most environmentally friendly option for achieving proposal objectives. Impact analysis then follows in order to identify and predict the likely environmental, social and other related effects of the proposal (Alexander & Fairbridge, 1999). In these steps, shortcomings in the EIA process are met when the supposed authority in identifying the adverse environmental impacts of the project is affected by a bias towards the implementation of the project rather than actual impact assessment. More often than not, EIA does not take into account the effects of several minor developments that tend to accumulate over time. Mitigation and impact management follows after impact analysis. The EIA process creates measures to avoid, minimize or offset predicted adverse impacts and incorporating of these into an environmental management plan should result in such impacts becoming almost negligible. The significance of these impacts, together with proposed measures for mitigation and the concerns of the stakeholder are documented in the Environmental Impact Statement or EIS. The EIS is then reviewed to determine whether the report meets its terms of reference, provides a satisfactory assessment of the proposal and contains the information required for decision-making (Alexander & Fairbridge, 1999). Typically, EIA is most effective when it occurs before the commencement of development, because this allows the precautionary principle to play a significant role (Saldanha, et al, 2007). Obviously, it is far more costly, both environmentally and financially, to shut down and clean up after a development than prevent or modify a proposed development. Unfortunately, EIA does not occur when it is most useful and is rather done late in the planning process. Thus, the project proponents have most likely already committed considerable financial resources to a particular option at a particular site. The EIS at this stage becomes another obstacle in a field of bureaucratic hurdles on the way to their end goal. Naturally, they will want that document to emphasise the advantages of the project to the community and to down play the disadvantages. Thus, some proponents may lead to either leaving out vital information or completely falsify results (Glasson, Therivel, & Chadwick, 2005). And so, when the EIA process moves on to decision-making, the primary concerns of the stakeholders are set aside to give way to the demands of the proponents. More importantly, the last part of the EIA process which is the follow up is often left out due to the cost and inconvenience that it entails (Alexander & Fairbridge, 1999). Indeed, Environmental Impact Assessment has become a biased process, mostly churning out decisions that are favorable to project proponents rather than for the true stakeholders of the impact assessment process. This can be partly explained because the firms or individuals that are responsible for conducting the assessment are most often hired by the project proponent themselves. Thus, it is but typical for these consultants to make their choices and judgments as favorable as possible to the ‘hand that feeds them’ while still trying to maintain their so-called ‘scientific credibility.’ Incidentally, EIA can be made more credible if the involvement of primary stakeholders and the transparency of the EIS are much more encouraged and given due importance. Of course, it has to be emphasized that certain steps must be taken to ensure that the process of EIA does contain appropriate checks and balances that would limit the omission of undesirable results and falsification or distortion of data. Only when these measures are taken into consideration can Environmental Impact Assessment truly serve its purpose and direct development projects towards the road of environmental sustainability. Bibliography Alexander, D., & Fairbridge, R., 1999. Encyclopedia of environmental science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Colombo, A., 1992. Environmental impact assessment. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Glasson, J., Therivel, R., & Chadwick, A., 2005. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. New York, NY: Routledge. Saldanha, L., et al., 2007. Green tapism: a review of the environmental impact assessment notification. Bangalore, India: Environment Support Group. Sheate, W., 1994. Making an impact: a guide to EIA law and policy. London: Cameron May. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Bias of Environmental Impact Assessment

Bulli Seam Operations Environmental Impact Assessment

Moreover, the environmental impact of this project to land, water swamps and the natural environment are assessed in this report.... In this report, a critical and analytical evaluation review of the socio-economic assessment of the project will be presented for BHP Billiton Pty.... L, to facilitate its participation in the NSW Planning assessment Commission.... From this perspective, the BHP Billiton provides the assessment of the social impacts of the project to the main stake holders that include the government and the local communities....
10 Pages (2500 words) Book Report/Review

Health Impact Assessment

The case study under the title"Health Impact Assessment" demonstrates the idea that Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is now a major trend in the realm of impact assessments, which overlaps and integrates with environmental impact assessment (EIA) processes.... The efficiency with which state legislation and public institutions in developing countries deliver and apply environmental management highly depends on their level and pace of socio-economic advancement....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Environmental Studies: Environmental Management Tools

The "environmental Studies: environmental Management Tools" paper critically discusses how 3 selected environmental tools or methods could be applied to minimize the environmental impacts of a 40 turbine onshore wind farm.... The contemporary wind farms are mostly large and not only help in environmental conservation but also bring a lot of benefits to the communities that live around the farms....
10 Pages (2500 words) Term Paper

Impact Prediction within EIA

environmental impact assessment (EIA) is a key instrument for the environmental policy of the European Union.... It is the consideration of environmental concerns in all phases of the project, from its conception to its operations, including its closure, if any, that helps design a project initiative that is more concerned with the receiving environment, without compromising the technical and economic feasibility of the project.... The two statements under assessment are Balloch Field Development by Maersk and Devenick Field Development Environmental Statement by British Petroleum....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Fonterra Tirau Environmental Impact

This paper presents an environmental impact assessment report of Fonterra Tirau with particular focus on the operations within the site, potential impacts of the operations on the environment as well as the current environmental management strategies employed by the site.... There are a number of features related to the activities of the Fonterra Tirau site that should have been included in the initial environmental impact assessment that was submitted to Environment Waikato at the time of the resource consent application....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

HR Assessment Policy

Peter Williams, the HR Director of ACME, has been asked by the board to standardise the organisation's policy on using psychometric assessment within recruitment.... The paper "HR assessment Policy" is a perfect example of an assignment on human resources.... The paper "HR assessment Policy" is a perfect example of an assignment on human resources.... As personality assessment will be used to select for various roles in the business, explain the importance of using job descriptions to inform the appropriate use of a personality questionnaire....
11 Pages (2750 words) Assignment

Social Impact Assessment of Coal Mining

This report "Social impact assessment of Coal Mining" presents the social impact assessment of the proposed open-cut coal mine in the Upper Hunter located 10 kilometers north-west of Scone conducted by Isago and Sons Lead experts on behalf of Waratah Creek coal mining company.... Social impact assessment (SIA) is a useful tool to help understand the potential range of impacts of a proposed change and the likely responses of those impacted if the change occurs....
10 Pages (2500 words) Report

The Execution of an Environmental Impact Assessment

The paper "The Execution of an environmental impact assessment" discusses that the Pembrey airport development authorities should be constituted based on individuals who are aware of the environmental impacts that this expansion shall have on the local community when it comes to an eruption of fire.... This scoping report shall therefore be prepared to conform to these laws and regulations so as to give a comprehensive outline on the environmental impact assessment requirements....
10 Pages (2500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us